Daniel Masur vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Masur vs B. Zapata Miralles
Daniel Masur
GER
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
4
Played
3
Win
31
Age
28
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
446
C. Rank
420
176
Best Rank
37
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$156.2K
Career Money
$1.3M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
ESP
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
4
Played
3
Win
31
Age
28
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
446
C. Rank
420
176
Best Rank
37
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$156.2K
Career Money
$1.3M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Masur 1 - 3 Miralles
They have played 10 sets in total, with Daniel Masur winning 4 and Bernabe Zapata Miralles winning 6. The last match between Bernabe Zapata Miralles and Daniel Masur was at the Glasgow Challenger, 18-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Bernabe Zapata Miralles getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Masur | 1 |
| Miralles | 3 |
Last 4 H2H Matches:
(R1) Glasgow Challenger(02-18-25)
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
6
6
Daniel Masur
2
3
(R2) Ludwigshafen Challenger(07-02-19)
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
0
6
6
Daniel Masur
6
1
0
(R1) Bergamo Challenger(02-18-19)
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
6
3
6
Daniel Masur
3
6
2
D. Masur vs B. Z. Miralles H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $156,200 | Career Prize Money | $1,252,255 |
| 56.70% (423-323) | Career Total W/L | 56.02% (433-340) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor | 2 |
| 15 | Titles | 13 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 3 |
| 0.00% (0-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Masur vs B. Z. Miralles Match Preview:
- Analyzing Second Serve Performance: Examining recent form in the past six months, Miralles has achieved a 41.67% success rate in winning points on their second serve, while Masur has outperformed with a 51.59% success rate. This statistical correlation holds significant bearing on the accuracy of match predictions.
- Evaluating Return Game Statistics: Recent return stats indicate that Miralles has triumphed in 50.4% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Masur has claimed victory in 51.8%. Likewise, Miralles has recorded a 32.38% success rate in first serve returns, whereas Masur stands at 29.03%. These figures bear high significance in determining the frontrunner in this clash.
- Comprehending Under Pressure Situations: When faced with breakpoints, Miralles has demonstrated resilience by saving 55.8% of them in recent form, while Masur has exhibited even stronger resolve with a saving rate of 62.94%. This particular statistic proves valuable when making in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview: Over the course of the last year, Miralles has enjoyed success in 40.82% of matches played, with a win-loss record of 20-29. In contrast, Masur has emerged triumphant in 53.97% of matches played, boasting a win-loss ratio of 34-29. Thus, providing us with an encompassing overview for predicting the outcome of their head-to-head encounter.
- Identifying the Best Surface: Assessing their respective career win percentages, Miralles flourishes on clay courts with a success rate of 62% (298-180), while facing relative challenges on indoor hard courts with a 42% win rate (39-54). As for Masur, clay remains their preferred battleground with a 56% victory rate (143-112), whereas grass presents more difficulties with a mere 41% success rate (9-13).
- Player Level: In the past year, Miralles has predominantly competed in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000, where they have triumphed in 46.15% of matches (18-21). Similarly, Masur has primarily engaged in Challenger and ITF tournaments exceeding the same prize money threshold, achieving victory in 56.76% of matches (21-16). Thus, when assessing various statistics to predict the favored player, it is essential to consider the level of the event they have been participating in.
- Head-to-Head Encounters: Miralles and Masur have previously crossed paths on three occasions, with Miralles emerging triumphant twice, while Masur secured a single victory. In a total of eight sets played, both athletes have equally achieved victory in four sets. Their most recent encounter took place at the Ludwigshafen Challenger on February 7th, 2019, on clay courts, where Bernabe Zapata Miralles emerged victorious with a score of 0-6, 6-1, 6-0.
- Duration of Head-to-Head Matches: Throughout their previous head-to-head encounters, the average duration of matches between these players amounts to 1 hour, 19 minutes, and 13 seconds.
- Predicting Decision-Making Sets: Miralles and Masur have engaged in deciding sets twice before, with Miralles emerging as the victor on both occasions, while Masur has yet to secure a victory. This information proves immensely valuable in forecasting the outcome if the current match extends to a deciding set.
- Intense Head-to-Head Pressure Situations: Miralles and Masur have contested one tiebreak against each other, with Miralles failing to secure a win, while Masur claimed victory in that particular instance.
- Analyzing Opponent Quality: Miralles has faced opponents with an average ranking of 221.14 over the past 12 months, while Masur's adversaries have possessed an average ranking of 374.84.
- Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players: When analyzing matches that have extended into a deciding set, Miralles has succeeded in winning 33% of these sets over the past year, whereas Masur has achieved a 40% success rate in all matches played on the professional tour.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past performance holds great significance in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event statistics to assess the performance of players in ongoing tournaments. Please refer to the section below for further information if either player has participated in a match during the present event. Additionally, certain players tend to excel at specific events, and such factors must be taken into consideration while predicting the outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: Recent form indicates that Miralles has successfully converted 42.06% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Masur has capitalized on 43.21% of chances to break their opponent's serve. This statistic plays a pivotal role in providing live betting tips when either player obtains a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are intrigued by models that predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. (Warning: For avid fans of statistics only)
Daniel Masur vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Masur vs B. Z. Miralles H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 3 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 6 |
| 36 | Games Won | 48 |
| 29 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 16 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:17:47 | Average Match Time | 1:17:47 |
| 58% (157/271) | 1st Serve % | 62% (151/244) |
| 74% (116/157) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (110/151) |
| 40% (46/114) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (50/93) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (12/28) |
| 34% (84/244) | Return Points Win % | 40% (109/271) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 0% (0/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Masur 50%, Miralles 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Masur 52%, Miralles 52%.
Break Points Saved %: Masur 55%, Miralles 51%.
D. Masur Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025 | ||||
Q1  Sascha Gueymard WayenburgS. Gueymard | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Bratislava 2 Challenger - 27-10-2025 | ||||
Q1  Chris RodeschC. Rodesch | L | 6-1 7-6(7) | ||
| Hamburg Challenger - 20-10-2025 | ||||
Q1  Sander JongS. Jong | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
 Tiburon Challenger - 29-09-2025 | ||||
R1  Mitchell KruegerM. Krueger | L | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q3  Luca CastagnolaL. Castagnola | W | 6-0 7-6(3) | ||
B. Z. Miralles Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hersonissos 6 Challenger - 13-10-2025 | ||||
R1  Dennis NovakD. Novak | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Valencia Challenger - 06-10-2025 | ||||
R1 Luka PavlovicL. Pavlovic | L | 2-6 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Villena Challenger - 29-09-2025 | ||||
Q1 Trey HilderbrandT. Hilderbrand | L | 7-6(5) 6-2 | ||
| Targu Mures 2 Challenger - 15-09-2025 | ||||
R1  Jack LogeJ. Loge | L | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Targu Mures 1 Challenger - 08-09-2025 | ||||
R1  Marco TrungellitiM. Trungelliti | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
D. Masur vs B. Z. Miralles Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.70% (423/323) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.02% (433/340) |
| 55.47% (973/781) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.78% (974/804) |
| 52.29% (8839/8065) | Games Win/Loss | 52.00% (8488/7835) |
| 56.80% (96/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.25% (69/74) |
| 55.11% (151/123) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.33% (314/198) |
| 59.43% (167/114) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41.58% (42/59) |
| 40.91% (9/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 47.06% (8/9) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 3125 | Aces Total | 1171 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1962 | Total Double Faults | 1272 |
| 1:20:15 | Average Match Time | 1:17:18 |
| 533.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 460.57 |
| 64% (28245/44260) | 1st Serve % | 66% (29593/44651) |
| 71% (20106/28245) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (18752/29593) |
| 49% (7869/16015) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7372/15054) |
| 41% (1731/4204) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (2209/4764) |
| 39% (17276/44702) | Return Points Win % | 42% (18091/43206) |
| 43.48% (10/13) | Slam W/L | 53.85% (21/18) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 28.00% (7/18) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 28.57% (12/30) | Main Tour W/L | 46.30% (50/58) |
| 52.53% (208/188) | Challenger W/L | 52.77% (162/145) |
| 68.09% (192/90) | Futures W/L | 65.75% (192/100) |
| 56% (413/732) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (416/734) |
| 50% (3/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 45% (10/22) |
| 48% (131/271) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (88/185) |
| 50% (131/264) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (116/218) |
| 81% (432/351) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (433/378) |
| 19% (432/80) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (433/55) |
| 22% (313/68) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (339/55) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
09:00 AM 14/11/25
Prediction
K. UchidaS. Shimabukuro3W1
2.72
W2
1.39
06:00 PM 13/11/25
Prediction
G. A. Boitan8A. IlaganW1
2.35
W2
1.51
12:15 PM 13/11/25
PredictionI. M. Curbelo
G. Hussey2W1
3.28
W2
1.285
02:30 PM 13/11/25
PredictionT. ParisWC
M. KukushkinqW1
2.35
W2
1.51
06:00 PM 13/11/25
Prediction
D. ChanWCA. GhibaudoW1
2.16
W2
1.6
12:00 PM 14/11/25
PredictionJ. SinnerB. SheltonW1
1.067
W2
9.7
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
13 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Taylor Fritz vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 13, 2025
12 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Marco Cecchinato vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Gustavo Heide vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Mark Lajal Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Ben Shelton vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
Taylor Fritz
Alex De Minaur16:00
H2H 5-5
Alexander ZverevFelix Auger Aliassime13:30
H2H 6-3
Jannik SinnerBen Shelton12:00
H2H 7-1
Carlos AlcarazLorenzo Musetti22:30
H2H 6-1
Dan AddedKyrian Jacquet19:00
H2H 0-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal